{"id":527,"date":"2018-12-22T17:08:00","date_gmt":"2018-12-22T16:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/?p=527"},"modified":"2020-05-11T16:16:02","modified_gmt":"2020-05-11T14:16:02","slug":"un-grand-jury-federal-va-examiner-la-plainte-deposee-par-le-lawyers-committee-for-911-inquiry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/un-grand-jury-federal-va-examiner-la-plainte-deposee-par-le-lawyers-committee-for-911-inquiry\/","title":{"rendered":"Un Grand Jury f\u00e9d\u00e9ral va examiner la plainte d\u00e9pos\u00e9e par le \u00ab\u00a0Lawyers Committee for 9\/11 Inquiry\u00a0\u00bb"},"content":{"rendered":"

En avril dernier, le <\/b>Lawyers Committee for 9\/11 Inquiry<\/a><\/b> a envoy\u00e9 une p\u00e9tition au procureur du district Sud de New York<\/b>.<\/p>\n

(Lien vers le document.)<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00c0 L\u2019issue du d\u00e9lai de six mois r\u00e9glementaire, ce-dernier a accept\u00e9 que la plainte soit examin\u00e9e par un \u00ab\u00a0grand jury f\u00e9d\u00e9ral<\/b>\u00ab\u00a0. (1)<\/p>\n

Dans ce document, le Comit\u00e9 pr\u00e9sente les r\u00e9sultats des diverses enqu<\/b>\u00ea<\/b>tes citoyennes qui prouvent la pr\u00e9sence d\u2019 ‘explosifs’ <\/b>plac\u00e9s pr\u00e9alablement <\/b>dans les 3 buildings du World Trade Center (tours jumelles et WTC7). <\/b>(2)
\n<\/b><\/p>\n

Il constate que la pr\u00e9sence de tels dispositifs constitue un crime f\u00e9d\u00e9ral<\/b> puisque les effondrements inattendus des tours -alors que les pompiers disaient ma\u00eetriser les incendies- sont la cause principale des quelques 3000 morts li\u00e9s aux attentats. Or ce crime n\u2019a pour le moment donn\u00e9 lieu \u00e0 aucune enqu\u00eate officielle ni poursuite judiciaire. (3)<\/p>\n

Les audiences devant le Grand jury devraient avoir lieu en 2019. Ce sera ainsi la premi\u00e8re fois, dix-huit ans apr\u00e8s les crimes, que la justice civile \u00e9tats-unienne se penchera sur cet aspect pourtant essentiel des attentats du 11\/9<\/b>.<\/p>\n

————–<\/p>\n

(1) Le droit am\u00e9ricain concernant cette d\u00e9marche est rappel\u00e9 en d\u00e9but du texte.<\/span><\/h6>\n
p7 : \u00ab\u00a0A Federal Grand Jury has broad powers to investigate the federal crimes of 9\/11\u00a0\u00bb<\/i>,
\np12 : \u00ab\u00a0The DOJ and the grand jury have a legal and a moral imperative to follow the evidence of 9\/11 wherever it may lead\u00a0\u00bb<\/i>.<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/h6>\n

(2) La partie F expose les multiples constats qui prouvent la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 d’un apport colossal d’\u00e9nergie. Il est probable qu\u2019il ne s\u2019agissait pas d\u2019explosifs conventionnels. Quoiqu\u2019il en soit, les compte-rendus officiels nient ces faits et ne peuvent les expliquer. <\/span>
\n (p22\u00a0: \u00ab\u00a0Evidence that Pre-planted Explosive and\/or Incendiary Devices Were Detonated and Ignited at the World Trade Center on 9\/11 is Broad and Conclusive<\/i>\u00ab\u00a0)<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/h6>\n

(3) p53 : \u00ab\u00a0In this case, the evidence is not only reasonable, it is compelling and disturbing. It raises serious questions about the events of 9\/11, and proves that other perpetrators beyond the alleged hijackers were involved in the slaughter of so many innocent people.\u00a0\u00bb<\/i><\/span>
\n<\/span><\/h6>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

En avril dernier, le Lawyers Committee for 9\/11 Inquiry a envoy\u00e9 une p\u00e9tition au procureur du district Sud de New York. (Lien vers le document.) \u00c0 L\u2019issue du d\u00e9lai de six mois r\u00e9glementaire, ce-dernier a accept\u00e9 que la plainte soit examin\u00e9e par un \u00ab\u00a0grand jury f\u00e9d\u00e9ral\u00ab\u00a0. (1) Dans ce document, le Comit\u00e9 pr\u00e9sente les r\u00e9sultats des diverses enqu\u00eates citoyennes qui Continuer la lecture Un Grand Jury f\u00e9d\u00e9ral va examiner la plainte d\u00e9pos\u00e9e par le \u00ab\u00a0Lawyers Committee for 9\/11 Inquiry\u00a0\u00bb<\/span>→<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/527"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=527"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/527\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":900,"href":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/527\/revisions\/900"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=527"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/elispring.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}